life in progress

Starseeds

People who have been born on Earth after (or concurrently to) living lifetimes in other star systems are sometimes called starseeds or hybrid souls. Starseeds are born with a soul history, a mission that supports Earth’s spiritual Ascension, dharma, etc., and sometimes (not very often) specific status. Alien royalty from extraterrestrial civilizations have at times incarnated on Earth and maintained a certain amount of status, in a sense. The significance of this may become clear in the coming years. All off-world status is of course automatically stripped from everyone who has become evil (including excessive toxicity of character, malicious conduct, etc.), even if they still maintain the responsibilities of their missions. Alien evil is certainly not allowed to exist on Earth nor impact Earth. Aliens do not have a physical manifestation in our Solar System other than starseeds.

Contemporary starseeds were born to help get humanity through the end of the grim Kali Yuga and to help make sure the glittering Satya Yuga blooms correctly, and they have individualized missions that dovetail with that central goal. Aliens want to participate in making Earth a paradise in matter, and a lot of that is how they’ve developed into starseeds and became people with missions to do good. All galaxies will joyfully experience the Satya Yuga as soon as we manifest it here on Earth.

Starseed histories are the stories of what an individual’s personal atman (spiritual spark that can reincarnate, which is distinct from a person’s soul vehicle) has done in terms of other life that is not based on Earth. Each person who identifies as a starseed may have experienced life as many different aliens in many extraterrestrial civilizations, but may particularly identify with the star systems they experienced the most times, or for the longest duration.

There are records of aliens talking to humans and passing along specific information. A lot of it is classified, or so they say. One widely known recorded example: Egg-shaped beings that identified themselves as being from Arcturus (probably Arcturans from the planet Arcturus 2) talked to humans about a coming Moonchild incarnation over a century ago, and that communication was added to the rest of the Moonchild prophecies on record, concerning a helpful oracle appearing on Earth.

I’ve done quite a bit of research on space and extraterrestrial life, some of it original (link below). In my shamanry practice, I can do past life readings, starseed readings, detect starseed royalty and missions, and much more.

Avoid evil. Starseeds that are evil are just evil humans, despite whatever spiritual claims they may make; they had (and may still have) a chance and obligation to be good humans, just like everyone else. Humans with more Earthbound soul lineages, whom I sometimes call O.G. Vega (original genome Vega), have all incarnated with missions to do good in pivotal times such as this as well. It’s ideally supposed to be all hands on deck, pulling for humanity and civilization together.

Let’s do our missions justice.

ミ☆

──── by Lync Dalton ────

PLEASE DONATE TO WEIRDO CAMP. Do you enjoy and/or enrich yourself with Weirdo Camp and its unique, original content? Please send a donation via Paypal (see site sidebar) or to $alchemylynx on Cash App.
Want the coolest tax deduction in the world? Donate to Terra Thesis Institute.

Good ships (the ancient African trade guilds had them)

In the ancient world, Africans knew where everything was, more or less. They had enormous ships of ingenious design that could cross the oceans with ease. It has been long known that Africans and later Vikings both probably discovered parts of the Americas long before Western Europeans arrived there bringing war. It’s true. Africans seemed to consider the Americas full of good destinations for fair trade, and they didn’t stop at crossing the Atlantic. They traveled everywhere, discovering landmass after landmass.

Doing past life work last year, I uncovered reports from King Solomon of ancient Israel (reign circa 970–931 B.C.) that he was aware (during his lifetime) of many West Africans knowing about every continent besides Australia, and that they could describe where they were and what they were like, along with islands in every ocean, and had done trade most everywhere. He also reported that the designs of their ships were proprietary to specific trade guilds and kept secret, and that you could not buy them.


image of carvings from the Temple of Seti I in Abydos depicting some mysterious objects that appear to be machines
Carvings of mysterious objects that look like vehicular machines at the Temple of Seti I at Abydos

At the Temple of Seti I at Abydos in Egypt, there are famous carvings depicting mysterious objects that many people have speculated to be early aircraft, technological prophecy, or UFOs. The carvings resemble vehicles. My process as a shaman has uncovered that the carvings in question may depict highly sophisticated seafaring ships from other kingdoms in Africa outside of Egypt. The kings of Egypt did not have any such ships, but perhaps felt that they could in a sense “own” them by having them carved in relief at the temple, according to what we know of the ancient Egyptian belief system. King Seti I (reign circa 1294–1279 B.C.) named himself after Set, a god of immigrants and foreign lands, and perhaps it stands to reason that he might have shown particular interest in foreign technologies. These carvings may be the best surviving record of what those astounding ancient African vessels really looked like.

──── by Lync Dalton ────

PLEASE DONATE TO WEIRDO CAMP. Do you enjoy and/or enrich yourself with Weirdo Camp and its unique, original content? Please send a donation via Paypal (see site sidebar) or to $alchemylynx on Cash App.
Want the coolest tax deduction in the world? Donate to Terra Thesis Institute.

To Big Tech:

It is my understanding that our negotiations on January 8th, 2022 are valid and true, and that we are proceeding in good faith. I look forward to hearing from you. This is in reference to a legitimized, legal surveillance-for-entertainment shadow industry (which preserves intellectual property and a reasonable right to privacy), my lucrative employment or compensation within it (special designation tiers since discussed astrally for me thus far: think tank; highly memetic; high activity audio and/or video), and a huge signing bonus (for the past several years of abuse and entertainment at my expense).

I think you already know that you do not have a right to do this to people without their informed consent.

Are you on the up and up with me? Are you willing to grant me all my rights, finally? Please do not be on the lowdown and dirty. I want the things I’ve negotiated and been promised in our astral conversations. Please do not take what we’ve agreed upon and funnel it away from me and to anyone else. A.G. and his terrorists were not invited by you (nor by me) into our negotiations in the first place, and he has no rights over me, my earnings, nor my labor (nor does anyone besides myself, potential income taxes notwithstanding). I have negotiated with some of you and with others for myself, and it was to benefit a lot of people too, but not instead of me. Theoretically, I can get past all the abuse that’s in the past if it stops now.

Of course, if surveillance or content is being used by your industry for any other purposes, I am not agreeing to that, and I ask that you make sure that I do very, very well if you ever took anything from me at all to add prestige and/or value to your work and/or brands.

If you’ve been involved in engineering the dissolution of my life in Vancouver, in plagiarism of me, in burying me in any way, or in anything else that would require restitution, please compensate me fairly for these grave losses.

Please donate to me or my think tank (whether you have been involved with/been aware of abuse of me or not). It would really help.

──── by Lync Dalton ────

PLEASE DONATE TO WEIRDO CAMP. Do you enjoy and/or enrich yourself with Weirdo Camp and its unique, original content? Please send a donation via Paypal (see site sidebar) or to $alchemylynx on Cash App.
Want the coolest tax deduction in the world? Donate to Terra Thesis Institute.

Confronting overpopulation

I was taught young that it isn’t the best idea to have too many billions of people on Earth. Elementary school, if I’m remembering correctly: there was some math, and at least one graph. They said food production couldn’t keep up. I think that factory farming methods and workhorse cultivars may have proven by now that technically, it can keep up. All my adult life I’ve thought about that gratefully.

Now the conversation about overpopulation is more about climate change, and has been since the early 2000s. The Georgia Guidestones, a mysterious monument erected anonymously in 1980 in the United States, are sometimes quoted as the potential key to a sustainable world.

Their inscription states the following suggestions (note: I will add my impressions in italics below each point):

  1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
    (note: I mean, why? We would need at least three billion people on Earth to maintain our current diversity of industries, though [according to Earth Logos]. If we want professional sports, comprehensive travel, and exotic pets, a half a billion just isn’t enough people.)
  2. Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity.
    (note: But, really? Tell me this isn’t about eugenics. Disregard this one, maybe.)
  3. Unite humanity with a living new language.
    (note: People really like their current languages. There’s the hitch. A universal second language might emerge at some point in the future, and that seems rather exciting.)
  4. Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason.
    (note: Sure thing. I’m doing that now. Good stuff.)
  5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
    (note: Yes, this is very good.)
  6. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
    (note: This is a nice idea about ending wars eventually, right? Most everyone always likes this sort of thing in theory and most generations going forward are going to be the ones that try it, I think.)
    (note: If we had only 500,000,000 people in perpetual balance with nature we’d probably be extremely worried about losing any to wars.)
  7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
    (note: Probably good. Avoid pettiness in exercising power. Avoid corruption.)
  8. Balance personal rights with social duties.
    (note: Yeah, let us not forget the social contract. It’s the stuff of civilization.)
  9. Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite.
    (note: Prize decency too, and wisdom, and kindness, understanding, and productive vision for the future. Prize goodness.)
  10. Be not a cancer on the Earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature.
    (note: Leave room for civilization in thought, word, and deed. And civilization must leave room for nature. That’s our ecosystem.)

Terence McKenna famously said that education was the way to approach overpopulation and reduce carbon emissions. In his lectures, he’d often point out that women with more formal education tend to have fewer children. The truth is, the education about overpopulation has begun. I think a lot of people worry about it already; but we still like people, right?

Population loss has something to do with what’s been called the Great Reset. Presumably, the Great Reset is about how certain parties have planned for (or perhaps even wanted?) a smaller population, possibly looking forward and foreseeing massive fatalities from climate change, pandemics, and other causes. One crucial point in this matter is to avoid anyone engineering population losses through violent means, or forcibly, which would never be justifiable. It strikes me that on some level it made sense to do economic and civic planning for a population drop, as many countries developed much of their modern infrastructure and systems after a post-1940s “baby boom”, and they were perhaps a little too close to perpetual growth models. Note that I have no idea if the set of plans described as the Great Reset are the right ones, nor even if they are cogent. Many have speculated that those plans may involve new taxes on the megawealthy or on certain industries, especially in light of how skewed wealth distribution has become since the mid 20th Century.

If we’re anxious at all for the population to go down here on Earth, it can be done with birth rates (which are already dropping in most places, they say, perhaps especially since the COVID-19 precautions began). The first-pass solution is probably to make oral contraceptives available over-the-counter (OTC) in as many places as possible. They are safe and effective, and I think their wider availability would help many people in my country, where they are currently sold by prescription only. The population initiative will be further helped by making sure birth control pills are affordable (possibly through insurance, the way some medical supplies are covered by most insurance plans). Hard to say how much we’d see the population go down organically and peacefully in a hundred years, but it is very likely we’d see sustainable population numbers by then.

Are we panicked about population? I don’t think we have to be.

──── by Lync Dalton ────

PLEASE DONATE TO WEIRDO CAMP. Do you enjoy and/or enrich yourself with Weirdo Camp and its unique, original content? Please send a donation via Paypal (see site sidebar) or to $alchemylynx on Cash App.
Want the coolest tax deduction in the world? Donate to Terra Thesis Institute.

On the state of the world

God, Goddess, the Universe, and the world are asking for a stop to all violence in the world that is not fully justified.

Are random acts of violence at an all-time high?

──── by Lync Dalton ────

PLEASE DONATE TO WEIRDO CAMP. Do you enjoy and/or enrich yourself with Weirdo Camp and its unique, original content? Please send a donation via Paypal (see site sidebar) or to $alchemylynx on Cash App.
Want the coolest tax deduction in the world? Donate to Terra Thesis Institute.

Nontheistic morals and ethics

In general, morals and ethics are related terms. Morals are valid encoded or natural and universal-enough ideas of right and wrong. Ethics are systems by which people navigate doing right over wrong, so that one’s conduct is good enough to satisfy the light, sweet burden of humanity.

In Kali Yuga-era religious traditions, there are a few different objectives that morals are designed to achieve.

  • Harm reduction
    • Some of the rules you’ll find in religious laws are extremely straight forward. They exist to reduce the harm that people cause through unjustified self interest and other antisocial motives.
    • These rules usually concentrate on minimizing interpersonal harm— the ways that people sometimes hurt, violate, and exploit one another. However, various religious codes also seek to reduce the harm that people cause to themselves, animals, their environment, etc.
    • Generally, religious laws that focus on harm reduction have a great deal of overlap with secular ethics. Most people— of any faith or lack thereof— tend to agree that rules that minimize interpersonal harm tend to be sensible, and are necessary for a peaceful society.
  • Social Cohesion and Continuity
    • Religions are in the business of building communities. Sometimes religious rules restrict behaviors, but don’t actively prevent harm in an obvious way. These rules have a community-based purpose. Restricting and encouraging specific behaviors can help define a community, and strengthen members’ identification with the group. This becomes an extreme problem in cases of dangerous cults.
    • For example, if I belong to a religion that instructs me to eat a certain way or dress a certain way, it’s not necessarily mitigating any harm I might do in the world. But it’s informing my identity. It’s making me feel closer to other people who eat and dress and worship the way I do. We’ve become a community of “us” in a sea of “them”. This too becomes an extreme problem in cases of dangerous cults.
    • Rules that achieve social cohesion vary widely between different faiths. As such, they’re extremely subjective, and usually have very little to do with secular codes of ethics.
  • Maintaining Power Structures and Institutions
    • Often, religious rules are put in place to perpetuate the power structures and institutions inside the faith. These often take the form of specific protocols and taboos intended to prevent reform, power struggles, and other shifts in the community.
    • Wherever hierarchies form, the people at the top tend to get very invested in maintaining the current power distribution. That’s human nature. (Whenever religious laws dovetail perfectly with keeping the people in power more happy than uncorrupted, I do think it’s worth asking how divine they actually.)
    • Rules that maintain specific hierarchies within religions aren’t necessarily supported by secular ethics (although they often are, if those hierarchies are doing good in the world). However, similar rules concerning governmental hierarchy are almost always encoded into secular law.

So when we’re talking about morals inside a theistic worldview, they might fall into one or more of those three categories.

Religions tend to have a lot of variation when it comes to moral laws that don’t focus on harm reduction.

Name an activity that’s not hurting anyone. You can probably find a handful of religions that embrace it, and others that consider it a terrible sin.

In this sense, some religious “morals” don’t have an objective reality. They’re sometimes highly subjective and variable, depending on which religion or sect or denomination we’re discussing.

However, the ethical notion of reducing the harm that humans do to other humans is close to universal. You find people in nearly every religion talking about reducing harm, needless suffering, and damage. You find atheists (and agnostics) saying the exact same things.

A rare sort of religious person might think that driving a car is evil.

A rare sort of religious person might think that any song with a repetitive, driving beat is the devil’s music.

A rare sort of religious person might believe that it’s morally repugnant for a woman to wear pants.

An ethical atheist probably doesn’t hold those beliefs. But an ethical atheist is almost certainly going to think that murder and terrorism are wrong, as would anyone, because murder and terrorism cause concrete and unjustifiable harm.

──── by Lync Dalton ────

PLEASE DONATE TO WEIRDO CAMP. Do you enjoy and/or enrich yourself with Weirdo Camp and its unique, original content? Please send a donation via Paypal (see site sidebar) or to $alchemylynx on Cash App.
Want the coolest tax deduction in the world? Donate to Terra Thesis Institute.

(This article by Lync Dalton first appeared on Quora in 2017)